Termination of relations and resource withdrawal On January 23, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced the formal completion of the United States’ withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO). This move entails an immediate cessation of all federal funding. Furthermore, Washington has recalled all American personnel and contractors stationed at the organization and ended its official participation in all WHO-led governing bodies and technical groups.
Outstanding financial obligations The U.S. currently owes approximately $260 million in unpaid membership dues. Under existing legal frameworks, a member state’s withdrawal is technically contingent upon fulfilling all financial obligations. However, legal experts suggest that full payment is unlikely, noting that the WHO possesses limited mechanisms to enforce such financial commitments.
Rationale and alternative strategy The U.S. administration justified the exit by stating that the WHO failed to provide adequate value relative to U.S. contributions and cited perceived shortcomings in the organization’s handling of past global health emergencies. Moving forward, Washington intends to lead global health initiatives through bilateral agreements and non-governmental partnerships, with the CDC’s Global Health Center expected to take a central coordinating role.
Concerns from the health community Public health authorities have warned that the U.S. departure may weaken the international capacity to detect and respond to cross-border biological threats. Experts argue that a fragmented bilateral approach cannot fully replicate the comprehensive global coordination framework provided by the WHO, potentially leaving the world more vulnerable to future pandemics.
Source: https://tuoitre.vn/my-chinh-thuc-rut-khoi-who-de-lai-khoan-no-260-trieu-usd-20260123141336194.htm